Question of the Week: Self-Certification

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A previous AVweb poll revealed that 60% of readers believe Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) offer minimal security and should be eliminated.
  • The FAA has recently increased Boeing's self-certification powers, reflecting a broader trend towards giving manufacturers more responsibility for certification, with the FAA acting in an auditing capacity.
  • This week's poll asks readers whether manufacturers should be granted greater latitude to self-certify aviation parts, processes, and even entire aircraft.
See a mistake? Contact us.

This Week’s Question |Previous Week’s Answers

PREVIOUS RESULTS ***

With Barack Obama on vacation under a Presidential TFR at Martha’s Vineyard this week, we’ve asked AVweb readers what they think of Temporary Flight Restrictions.

Not much, as it turns out. 60% of those who took time to answer last week’s Question said TFRs provide little real security and should be eliminated. A tiny contingent on readers (only 13 of you) thought TFRs were a good compromise between security and freedom of flight.

For a complete (real-time) breakdown of reader responses, click here.
(You may be asked to register and answer if you haven’t already participated in this poll.)

THIS WEEK’S QUESTION ***

The FAA recently gave Boeing much greater self-certification powers, and there is a general movement toward giving manufacturers more certification responsibilities, with the FAA auditing them. We want to know if you think that’s a good idea.

Should manufacturers have greater latitude to self-certify parts, processes, and even whole airplanes?
(click to answer)


Have an idea for a new “Question of the Week”? Send your suggestions to .

NOTE:
This address is only for suggested “QOTW” questions, and not for “QOTW” answers or comments.
Use this form to send “QOTW” comments to our AVmail Editor.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE