Battery Issue Grounds JAL 787

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A Japan Airlines Boeing 787 was grounded at Tokyo's Narita Airport after an overheated cell was detected in one of its lithium-ion batteries.
  • The safety modifications implemented after a 2013 grounding of the 787 fleet appeared to function as intended, containing the heat to a single cell and venting fumes externally.
  • The incident occurred without passengers aboard and highlights ongoing concerns, echoing previous battery fires on 787s that led to a worldwide grounding in 2013.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A Japan Airlines Boeing 787 was grounded early Wednesday because of an overheated cell in one of its lithium ion batteries. According to the Puget Sound Business Journal, the incident occurred about 4 a.m. local time at Tokyo’s Narita Airport. The aircraft did not have any passengers aboard but was scheduled to fly to Bangkok two hours later. It appears that modifications made to the batteries and associated systems added to 787s after a three-month grounding in 2013 did their job in the incident.The improvements made to the 787 battery system last year appear to have worked as designed, Boeing said in astatement. We sincerely regret any impact caused toJapan Airlinesand are working with them to return this airplane to service.One of the battery’s eight cells overheated but it did not spread to the rest of the battery, suggesting the extra insulation installed in the batteries kept the heat from spreading. The containment and exhaust system encasing the battery apparently kept the heat from damaging anything else and the fumes were vented outside, according to the early reports.

JAL quickly found another plane for the Bangkok trip but the larger question of what impact the incident will have on 787 operations likely won’t be clear until later Wednesday. It was a fire in a Japan Airlines 787 at Boston’s Logan Airport a year ago, and an in-flight fire aboard an ANA Dreamliner a couple of weeks later, that led to the grounding of more than 50 of the aircraft worldwide for three months last year.The NTSB still hasn’t issued its final report on those incidents. That report isn’t expected until sometime next year.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.