…Crash Airplane Met AD…

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The crashed T-34, G-13, had extensive prior use in mock air combat operations and had met an Alternate Means of Compliance (AMOC) for an Airworthiness Directive (AD).
  • Its AMOC specifically involved the installation of a used Baron spar in 1995, which is one of four approved methods to address the AD.
  • The aircraft had previously sustained damage to its right rear wing spar from an in-flight canopy opening, and it is not yet known if this contributed to the recent structural failure.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The aircraft in the most recent crash was an early T-34, serial number G-13, and had seen extensive use in mock air combat operations, including a stint with Georgia-based Sky Warriors, before it was acquired by Texas Air Aces. Like virtually the entire fleet of T-34s, it had met one of the alternate means of compliance (AMOC) to the AD requiring extensive spar inspection and/or a prohibition on aerobatics. George Braly, whose company, General Aviation Modifications Inc., developed its own AMOC in concert with the T-34 Association, told AVweb that the crash aircraft had been fitted with a used Baron spar sometime in 1995. The replacement spar qualifies as one of four AMOC methods, which include replacement spars, a re-enforcing gusset in the stressed area and a hefty external steel strap bridging the wings across the belly. Sometime after G-13 had its used Baron spar installed, the aircraft suffered an in-flight canopy opening and the right rear wing spar suffered damage when the canopy departed the aircraft. It’s not yet known if this was a factor in the structural failure.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE