…FAA, NATCA, She Said, He Said…

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • FAA Administrator Blakey criticizes the existing contract with air traffic controllers (NATCA) as a "bad deal," citing high controller pay (averaging over $165,000) and the union's alleged "de facto control" over scheduling and staffing, claims vehemently denied by NATCA's president Carr.
  • NATCA views recent FAA actions, including a critical report on New York TRACON staffing, as "strong-arm tactics" and an "aggressive PR campaign" designed to influence upcoming contract negotiations.
  • Blakey explicitly dismissed any notion of privatizing air traffic control, while both she and Carr agreed on the critical need and significant cost for new technologies and methods to manage increasing traffic.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Blakey told reporters that, “We can’t afford an agreement like 1998.” The existing contract, signed under a previous administrator and extended by her two years ago, is a “bad deal” that costs too much. She said the average controller’s annual pay package, excluding retirement benefits, is now more than $165,000 and that some make more than $200,000 a year. Blakey also claims the contract gives the union “de facto control” over scheduling and staffing levels. NATCA’s Carr vehemently denied that the union had seized control of staffing and shifting, and offered to pay Blakey or any of the reporters taking part in his teleconference $1 million if they could find within the wording of the existing contract proof the union was granted such powers. Carr called the assertions “patently false” and said it’s ludicrous to think that a bureaucracy the size of the FAA could be cowed by a 15,000-member union.

The disagreement comes a couple of months after the FAA issued a blistering report on staffing and overtime issues at the New York Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) that painted the picture that FAA managers had virtually lost control of the facility. She noted that the conditions in New York are not typical of the agency’s other facilities. However, Carr alleged that both the timing and content of the report were a “shot across the bow” and part of a “very aggressive PR campaign leading up to the negotiations” on the part of the FAA. He described the FAA’s handling of the New York situation and other recent decisions, like the disbanding of a union-management liaison unit on technology, “strong-arm tactics” and accused the FAA of having a “narrow and ideologically driven” agenda. Blakey eliminated one potential hot spot from the discussions — privatization. She dismissed any notion of privatization or outsourcing air traffic control and said any discussion on the topic would be a red herring. Blakey and Carr both agreed that new technologies and new methods must be employed to meet rapidly increasing traffic counts and that both will cost huge amounts of money.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE