Now, we all know that satellite-based systems will largely replace curve-of-the-earth-hampered ground stations and we all know that it will require some extra equipment on board. But is VFR going to be somehow limited or discouraged in the process? The GAO seems to think so. The Government Accountability Office recently released its latest in the series of updates on just how the FAA is doing with its modernization plans (better, it turns out). That document contains vaguely disturbing references to just how VFR fits into the Next Generation Air Traffic System (NGATS). The report contains three references (p. 2, 5 and 29) calling it a “critical policy issue” to determine “the extent to which NGATS will accommodate visual flights versus instrument-only flights.” It’s not clear from the document’s wording what that all means but clearly there’s some discussion at the FAA on how to fit the majority of GA flights into a system that, it appears, will rely heavily on instrumentation to keep us from banging into one another. The “the level of monitoring needed by pilots when automation is ensuring safe separation from surrounding aircraft” is another concern as is the inevitably of the screens going blank.
GAO Worries About The Future Of VFR
Key Takeaways:
- The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has identified accommodating Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flights within the new Next Generation Air Traffic System (NGATS) as a "critical policy issue."
- There is concern that NGATS, which will rely heavily on instrumentation and automation, might limit or discourage VFR flights.
- Other issues raised include the required level of pilot monitoring when automation ensures separation and the potential for system malfunctions, such as screens going blank.
See a mistake? Contact us.