NATCA spokesman Doug Church told AVweb on Tuesday that the FAA action amounts to “a grandiose publicity stunt.” Four and a half months is not much time to spend on a such a big, complex contract, he said – the last contract took over a year to negotiate — and NATCA had already scheduled talks with the FAA well into February. “The administrator had an idea that we should be done by Christmas, but that was never part of this deal,” he said. Blakey’s action “exposes the true agenda of the FAA,” Church said – to derail the negotiations and send the contract to Congress. Once the talks are in mediation, either side can declare an impasse if progress stalls. “Then Congress has to act within 60 days on the proposals from each side – which they won’t – and then, FAA can impose their ‘last best offer,'” Church said. The existing contract has expired, but remains in force as long as talks continue.
…NATCA Disagrees…
Key Takeaways:
- NATCA views the FAA's accelerated contract negotiation timeline as a "grandiose publicity stunt," asserting that 4.5 months is insufficient for a complex agreement that previously took over a year.
- The union believes the FAA's true motive is to derail negotiations and force the contract to Congress, which would allow the FAA to impose its "last best offer" after an impasse.
- NATCA clarifies that the "Christmas deadline" for an agreement was unilaterally set by the administrator and never agreed upon by the union, which had already scheduled talks into February.
See a mistake? Contact us.
