Judge Dismisses MAX Pilots’ Suit Against Boeing

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A federal judge has ruled that Boeing is not required to compensate pilots for career disruption and lost income suffered when the 737 MAX was grounded in March 2019.
  • The judge dismissed the lawsuit, stating that issues with the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) were not closely enough linked to the pilots' financial losses to create a legal case for damages.
  • The ruling concluded that extending causation to cover individuals not involved in plane crashes would broaden the boundaries of liability too far.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A federal judge has ruled that Boeing doesn’t have to pay for the career disruption suffered by pilots who were freshly typed in the 737 MAX when it was grounded in March of 2019. According to Simple Flying Judge Steven C. Seeger, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, agreed some pilots lost income because of the grounding but the issues with the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System were not closely enough linked to those losses to give the pilots a legal case for damages. He dismissed their suit against Boeing on Monday.

“Stretching causation to cover people who weren’t on the [crashed 737 MAX] planes would expand the boundaries of liability much too far,” Seeger wrote in the judgment quoted by Simple Flying. “It is foreseeable that a defective plane might not fly. And it is natural to think that a defective design might cause accidents. But when you think about a defective plane, and the problems that could ensue, lost income by people who don’t crash probably isn’t at the top of the list.”

Russ Niles

Russ Niles is Editor-in-Chief of AVweb. He has been a pilot for 30 years and joined AVweb 22 years ago. He and his wife Marni live in southern British Columbia where they also operate a small winery.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.