A320 Drone Strike Suspected

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A British Airways A320 captain reported a suspected drone strike on approach to London Heathrow, but the aircraft landed safely and was cleared for its next flight with no confirmed damage.
  • Authorities like the UK CAA emphasize that flying drones near airports is unacceptable and carries severe penalties, while the drone industry suggests manufacturers implement geofencing to prevent such incidents.
  • Although pilots have reported numerous "close encounters" with drones, there have been no confirmed drone-aircraft collisions to date.
See a mistake? Contact us.

file photo: Wikimedia

The captain of aBritish AirwaysAirbus A320 flying into London’s Heathrow Airport on Sunday afternoon told authorities he believed the front of the airplane was hit by a drone on approach. The airplane landed safely and it was examined carefully by engineers. It hasn’t been reported what damage they found, if any, but they cleared the aircraft to take off on its next scheduled flight. “It is totally unacceptable to fly drones close to airports and anyone flouting the rules can face severe penalties including imprisonment,” Britain’s Civil Aviation Authority said in a statement after the incident.

Paul Rigby, a spokesman for the drone industry, said such incidents are preventable. “We should have geofencing for consumers that are embedded into the drones,” he told the International Business Times. “The burden is definitely on the manufacturers to take responsibility for the capabilities they’re introducing.” Such features could be turned off for trained commercial users. A recent analysis by Bard College found 188 “close encounters” reported by pilots to the FAA between August 2015 and January 2016. So far no drone-aircraft collisions have been confirmed.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE