Van’s Lawsuit Seen As Attack On Kit Industry

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Van's Aircraft is facing a $35 million lawsuit alleging it creates an "unreasonable expectation" that individuals without specific skills can safely build kit aircraft, potentially impacting the entire kit aircraft industry.
  • The lawsuit originates from a 2014 RV-10 crash that killed a pilot and a four-year-old girl, which the NTSB attributed to the pilot's "improper maintenance practices" leading to a blocked fuel line and subsequent failure to maintain adequate airspeed.
  • Van's defends its safety record, asserting that builder judgment in construction and maintenance is crucial, and views the suit as an unfortunate attack on the general kit aircraft industry.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Van’s Aircraft is warning that a $35 million lawsuit filed against it in Oregon might actually be an indictment of the whole kit aircraft business. The family of a four-year-old girl who died in an RV-10 flown by her step-grandfather claims the kit manufacturer creates the unreasonable expectation that people who lack skills and training can successfully build safe aircraft. In an interview with Reuters, Van’s president, Scott Risan, said it’s not just Van’s that will be on trial. “We do a really good job with the safety of the airplanes,” Risan told Reuters. “It’s up to the builder to use good judgment when they are building and maintaining the airplane. The lawsuit seems to be kind of attacking the industry in general and that’s unfortunate.” The NTSB blamed the accident on a blocked fuel line followed by a stall.

Doug Nebert, a well-known and experienced RV builder from Newport, Oregon, was taking off from Toledo, Oregon, when the aircraft had engine trouble on May 31, 2014, and crashed in the parking lot of a paper mill. Nebert and his four-year-old step-granddaughter, Zoe Wahl, died. Wahl’s mother, April Gleason, was severely injured. Gleason’s lawyer, Matthew Clarke, told Reuters the building instructions are inadequate and it also named Floscan Instruments in the suit, claiming the fuel flow transducer it supplied was unsafe. The NTSB blamed Nebert, however. It said the accident was caused by a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation from the blocked fuel line, likely from a bead of silicone in a recently installed fuel flow transducer. It blamed the blocked fuel line on Nebert’s “improper maintenance practices” and the accident on his “subsequent failure to maintain adequate airspeed while attempting a forced landing.” The suit says there should have been a bypass around the transducer to prevent a blockage.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE