EU Authorizes Use of US Jet Fuel to Mitigate Supply Chain Disruptions

European Aviation Safety Agency says the fuel type is safe for properly managed operations.

WSU Study Finds SAF Production Could Fall Short Of 2030 Target
[Credit: Jaromir Chalabala | Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The European Commission has authorized EU airlines to use U.S. Jet A fuel to mitigate rising costs and potential shortages stemming from the Strait of Hormuz closure and disrupted energy supply chains.
  • The EU Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) cleared U.S. Jet A for use in Europe, despite its higher freezing point, assuring safety if operational risks are properly managed, especially ahead of the peak summer travel season.
  • Amid the energy crunch, EU passenger protection laws remain in effect, requiring airlines to compensate travelers for cancellations driven by high fuel costs, and proposals are being considered to restrict non-essential private jet flights.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The European Commission has released a new guidance notice clarifying European Union rules for airlines and permitting use of U.S. Jet A fuel.

The authorization comes as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed for over two months due to the Iran conflict – disrupting energy supply chains and driving up fuel costs.

The report stated that while the Commission maintains that travel options remain broadly unaffected, the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz has reduced maritime energy exports to a “trickle,” impacting the affordability of transport services across the EU.

Jet A Fuel Integration

To mitigate the risk of potential shortages during the peak summer travel season, the EU Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has cleared the way for the use of U.S.-produced “Jet A” aviation fuel in Europe.

According to a report by Barron’s, Jet A is currently only used in Europe for technical reasons on return flights from the U.S. The report noted that U.S.-produced Jet A has a higher freezing point than the Jet A-1 fuel standard typically used elsewhere in the world, making it slightly less resistant to extreme low temperatures on long-haul routes. 

EASA maintains that introducing Jet A will not generate safety concerns if the operational risks of managing both fuel types within the same system are properly handled.

Despite the economic pressure of rising fuel prices, EU Transport Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas has affirmed that passenger protection laws remain in full effect. The commissioner clarified that increased jet fuel costs do not qualify as “extraordinary circumstances” that would exempt airlines from compensating travelers for cancellations.

The crisis has also prompted European lawmakers to propose temporary restrictions on non-essential private jet flights to prioritize fuel for critical services and government functions. While business aviation groups like the EBAA argue that the sector accounts for only a minority of total fuel consumption, proponents of the restrictions cite the need for social equity during a widespread energy crunch.

Caleb Revill

Caleb Revill is a journalist, writer and lifelong learner working as a Junior Writer for Firecrown. When he isn't tackling breaking news, Caleb is on the lookout for fascinating feature stories.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 4

  1. Ahh, Socialism! Karl Marx would be proud!

  2. Since U.S. carriers fly the same environment regimes as EU carriers I find it hard to understand why either fuel would be prohibited in any way as the aircraft and engine manufacturers are the ones responsible for the determination of fuel requirements.

  3. Traditionally you will predominantly find Jet A-1 in Europe rather than Jet A. The EASA Safety Information Bulletin highlights the small, but in some specific circumstances important, differences between Jet A-1 and Jet A fuel specifications. Main areas being differences in freezing point (operations where cold soaking of fuel could be an issue), electrical conductivity (static electricity dissipation) and total acidity. The SIB reiterates that only fuel specification approved in the AFM should be used. European airlines which operate already transatlantic routes are already familiar with the differences as the eastbound flight is invariably flown on Jet A; however, operators who do not regularly fly to the Americas might not be familiar with these nuances.

  4. Let’s stay on topic.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE