Honeywell, Jeppesen Develop RNP for Business Aircraft

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Honeywell and Jeppesen demonstrated a Required Navigation Performance (RNP) approach for business aircraft, designed to provide precision guidance and more controlled descents in challenging conditions.
  • RNP technology utilizes GPS and ground stations to enable lower minimums and a continuous descent technique, offering significant improvements over traditional "dive and drive" methods.
  • Jeppesen is working with the FAA as a contractor to accelerate the development and deployment of RNP approaches to airports nationwide.
  • Challenges to widespread RNP adoption include legal and business issues, such as compensation for public domain procedures and determining FAA liability after approval.
See a mistake? Contact us.
Click for a Larger Image

Honeywell and Jeppesen recently completed a Required Navigation Performance (RNP) approach for Morristown, N.J. to show how such procedures can be developed for the use of business arircraft. RNP uses GPS and ground stations to provide precision guidance for aircraft flying into airports with congested airspace, difficult terrain and bad weather. Some airlines use the approaches, but Honeywell and Jeppesen believe business aircraft operators represent a major market for the technology. “RNP allows pilots flying the approach to use a more controlled continuous descent technique versus the traditional “dive and drive” method and offers lower minimums than the current GPS procedure,” said a joint press release. Jeppesen is also part of an FAA experiment that could lead to more rapid RNP deployment.

Jeppesen spokesman Andy McDowell said the company is one of two chosen to develop RNP approaches for the FAA as a contractor so that the systems can be put into airports that want it faster. McDowell said the actual design and deployment of the approaches is straightforward but there are some legal and business issues to be dealt with. For instance, the RNP approaches will be public domain so the companies paying for their development will not be compensated, other than in the cost savings they’ll realize by having more reliable access to the airport. There’s also the question of whether liability will be assumed by the FAA after it has signed off on the new approaches.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE