Aviation Organizations Oppose Foreign Maintenance Oversight Bill

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The "Safe Aircraft Maintenance Standards Act" (H.R. 5119) has been introduced to increase FAA oversight of foreign aircraft repair stations, aiming to standardize safety regardless of location.
  • Key provisions of H.R. 5119 include annual unannounced FAA inspections, mandatory FAA certification for foreign mechanics and supervisors, extensive monthly maintenance reporting, and a moratorium on new foreign repair station certifications if requirements are not met.
  • A coalition of eleven aviation organizations, led by ARSA, strongly opposes the bill, arguing its requirements are impractical, would create an overload of irrelevant data, and could damage international aviation cooperation.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The Aeronautical Repair Station Association (ARSA) and ten other aviation organizations have come out in opposition of a recently introduced bill aimed at increasing FAA oversight of repair stations located outside of the United States. The Safe Aircraft Maintenance Standards Act (H.R. 5119) was introduced by U.S. House of Representatives Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Chairman Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., last Friday.

Provisions laid out in H.R. 5119 (PDF) include annual unannounced FAA inspections for foreign repair stations, requiring certain air carriers to provide detailed monthly maintenance reports for FAA analysis and requiring supervisors and mechanics to be certified under FAA regulations regardless of location. The bill would also put a moratorium on FAA certification of new foreign repair stations if the FAA does not implement the new requirements, including issuing a rule to require security assessments of foreign repair station employees, within one year of the bill being enacted.

“For years I’ve pressed FAA officials to heed the warnings from its own Inspector General and to do more to close the gap between our safety standards and those of foreign repair stations,” said DeFazio. “The bill I’m introducing … does just that by establishing one standard of safety regardless of where the aircraft is maintained.”

According to a letter (PDF) sent by the ARSA-led coalition to the chairman and ranking members of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee and Aviation Subcommittee, the groups believe the new record-keeping and reporting requirements the bill suggests “do nothing to help focus regulators on safety critical information and will simply overwhelm them with irrelevant data.” In addition, the letter states that H.R. 5119 “puts in place regulatory requirements that would be likely impossible to implement” and runs the risk of impacting cooperation with international aviation authorities “including key bilateral aviation safety partners.”

Along with ARSA, the letter was signed by organizations including the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA), General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), International Air Transport Association (IATA) and National Air Carrier Association (NACA).

Kate O'Connor

Kate is a private pilot, certificated aircraft dispatcher, and graduate of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE