French Investigators Join NTSB In Criticizing Ethiopian 737 Max Report

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • France's BEA (Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses), along with the U.S. NTSB, has critiqued Ethiopia’s final report on the 2019 Ethiopian Airlines Boeing Max 8 crash.
  • Both the BEA and NTSB assert that the Ethiopian report, which focused on the MCAS system, underplayed or omitted their comments concerning human factors and crew performance.
  • The French investigators believe that a deeper analysis of the crew's performance would provide valuable safety lessons beyond those solely related to the MCAS system.
See a mistake? Contact us.

France’s aviation accident investigation entity, the Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA), has joined the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in critiquing Ethiopia’s final report on the infamous 2019 fatal crash of a Boeing Max 8 airliner operated by Ethiopian Airlines. The official accident report was filed last week by Ethiopia’s [Aircraft] Accident Investigation Bureau (EAIB).

The BEA had been called in by the EAIB to analyze data from the twinjet’s flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder, and submitted comments that it judged were underplayed by the Ethiopians.

As did the NTSB, the BEA said its comments regarding human factors were not included in the final EAIB report, which was filed last week, and which focused on the failure of the Boeing’s Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS). The French investigators wrote, “From January 2021, the NTSB and the BEA were consulted on a draft of the final report. The NTSB and the BEA requested in particular that the aspects related to the performance of the crew be better exposed and analyzed. These exchanges did not result in satisfying amendments to the final report and led the NTSB and the BEA to request that their comments be appended to the final report.”

The French authority further criticized, “BEA’s comments are mainly related to the analysis of the crew’s performance and its contribution to the accident scenario, in particular, during the first part of the flight (between the rupture of the angle of attack vane and the activation of the MCAS system). The BEA considers that this analysis would make it possible to draw safety lessons beyond those related to the MCAS system.”

Mark Phelps

Mark Phelps is a senior editor at AVweb. He is an instrument rated private pilot and former owner of a Grumman American AA1B and a V-tail Bonanza.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.