AVweb’s Question of the Week …

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A recent AVweb poll showed that a plurality (48%) of respondents believe spin training should be mandatory for both Private and Sport Pilots, advocating for a change in current regulations.
  • Other opinions on spin training for Sport Pilots ranged from "definitely" (11%) to "no need" (9%), with 30% opposing it due to perceived danger, and some advocating for parachute deployment in emergencies.
  • This week's AVweb question challenges readers to determine the legality of VFR flight in a scenario where a pilot flying above an overcast layer loses all visual ground contact, despite clear skies above and at their destination.
See a mistake? Contact us.
*** PREVIOUS RESULTS ***

Last week, one AVweb reader asked if spin training should be included with Sport Pilot training.  11% of respondents said “definitely,” while another 9% argued there’s no need for spin training at the Sport Pilot level when it isn’t even part of Private Pilot training.

The most popular response from AVweb readers by far was this one:  The rules need to be changed. We all should have spin training very early on – that means Private Pilots AND Sport Pilots.  48% of our respondents agreed with this “safety for all” statement.

The remaining 30% of participants said “no” to spin training, pointing out that spins are dangerous and relatively easy to avoid – no need to risk the lives of pilots and CFIs training for such a situation, especially when we’re training weekend fliers.

Six readers (Cirrus pilots, no doubt) said, “When in doubt, pull the ‘chute.”

*** THIS WEEK’S QUESTION ***

This week, another reader steps up to the plate with a puzzling question for AVweb readers.  We all have a pretty good understanding of what constitutes VFR, right?  Well, let’s consider this scenario from AVweb reader Steve Biddle:

You depart VFR in VFR conditions on a cross-country. Midway through your trip, you start to see a lower layer (overcast) in front of you. You have the required cloud clearance of 1000 above, and it is clear above. Your destination is reporting clear skies so you proceed. But once you find yourself above the overcast you realize you no longer have any visual ground contact. There is nothing but a layer of cloud below you. Are you still legally VFR at that point? Soon the overcast layer becomes broken, then scattered, finally clear – and you land at your destination without incident. But what about the halfway point of the trip that you had no visual reference to the ground?

What do you think? Was this pilot flying VFR?  Was he legal?

Do you have a suggestion for “Question of the Week”?  Many of our recent “QOTW”s have been reader-submitted.  If you have a question you’d like to pose to the AVweb readership, send it toqotw@avweb.com for consideration.

Note: This address is only for suggested QOTW questions, and not for QOTW answers.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.