AVweb’s Question of the Week …

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A previous AVweb poll revealed that 85% of readers consider Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) often inane or useless, with 15% defending their necessity.
  • This week's poll asks readers to decide whether aviation lawsuits serve a higher purpose or are merely a distraction from the business of aviation.
See a mistake? Contact us.
*** PREVIOUS RESULTS ***

Last week, AVweb asked our readers to pick a side when it comes to those pesky TFRs (temporary flight restrictions) that have become all-too-common in the post-9/11 world.  The overwhelming majority – 85% of respondents, or 565 people – said that TFRs are often inane, indecipherable, and (at their most harmless) utterly useless.  But the remaining 15% of you defended TFRs, saying the restrictions are often necessary to protect pilots, passengers, and leaders in these dangerous times.

*** THIS WEEK’S QUESTION ***

This week, we want to ask a similar question about aviation lawsuits.  Do they serve higher a purpose, or are they merely a distraction from the real business of aviation?  As before, we know you may not fully agree with either statement – but for the purposes of the poll, we ask that you pick a side.

Have an idea for a new QOTW? Send your suggestions toqotw@avweb.com.

Note: This address is only for suggested QOTW questions, and not for QOTW answers.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.