*** PREVIOUS RESULTS *** Before we left for Sun ‘n Fun, AVweb polled readers on the possibility of implementing a missile defense system to protect airliners.
We asked if the threat justified such an expensive defense strategy, and most of our readership said no. 42% of you answered with a flat-out no, while another 47% qualified their response by choosing Morally, yes. Financially and statistically, no.
A small but noteworthy 11% of readers, however, said yes.
*** THIS WEEK’S QUESTION ***
Lycoming engines – again. Should owners have to pay to replace suspect crankshafts built into their engines?
Have an idea for a new QOTW? Send your suggestions toqotw@avweb.com.
NOTE:
This address is only for suggested QOTW questions, and not for QOTW answers or comments.
Usethis form to send QOTW comments to our AVmail Editor.
Question of the Week
Key Takeaways:
- A previous AVweb poll found that 89% of readers opposed or qualified their opposition to an expensive missile defense system for airliners, mainly due to financial and statistical concerns.
- The current "Question of the Week" asks whether Lycoming engine owners should bear the cost of replacing suspect crankshafts.
- Readers are invited to submit suggestions for new poll questions or provide comments on current polls via specific contact methods.
See a mistake? Contact us.
