Turn-and-Slip vs. Turn Coordinator

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The author replaced a faulty turn-and-slip instrument with a turn coordinator but found it unsatisfactory due to the poor design of its slip-skid indicator (the ball).
  • The turn coordinator's ball was too small, mounted too low, and poorly illuminated, making it difficult to read and impractical for essential rudder trim adjustments, especially at night.
  • Frustrated by these deficiencies, the author removed the turn coordinator and reinstalled a traditional turn-and-slip instrument.
  • The article suggests that an old-fashioned turn-and-slip instrument may be a better choice for a panel unless an autopilot specifically requires a turn coordinator.
See a mistake? Contact us.

When the factory-installed turn-and-slip instrument in my Cessna 310 took a dive some years ago, I decided to replace it with a turn coordinator. It didn’t take me long to discover that I hated it.

My biggest gripe with the new TC was that its slip-skid indicator (the ball) was much smaller and mounted much lower on the instrument face than it had been on the older turn-and-slip instrument. At night, the two post lights mounted in the two upper corners of the instrument would illuminate the little airplane just fine, but the ball was down in a “black hole” that I could only read by whipping out my mini-Maglite.

Since the turn gyro is mostly used for backup but the slip-skid ball is used constantly on every flight (to adjust rudder trim), I found this deficiency to be absolutely intolerable. Bottom line: I tore out the TC and installed another traditional turn-and-slip instrument. The TC now graces a knick-knack shelf at home.

If your autopilot requires a TC to function, you’re pretty well stuck with it. If it doesn’t, you might decide that an old-fashioned T&S is the better choice for your panel.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE