Turn-and-Slip vs. Turn Coordinator

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The author disliked replacing his aircraft's turn-and-slip instrument with a turn coordinator, finding the new instrument intolerable.
  • His primary complaint was the turn coordinator's slip-skid indicator (the ball) being smaller, lower, and poorly illuminated, hindering its constant use.
  • He ultimately reverted to a traditional turn-and-slip instrument and recommends it as a better choice unless an autopilot specifically requires a turn coordinator.
See a mistake? Contact us.

When the factory-installed turn-and-slip instrument in my Cessna 310 took a dive some years ago, I decided to replace it with a turn coordinator. It didn’t take me long to discover that I hated it.

My biggest gripe with the new TC was that its slip-skid indicator (the ball) was much smaller and mounted much lower on the instrument face than it had been on the older turn-and-slip instrument. At night, the two post lights mounted in the two upper corners of the instrument would illuminate the little airplane just fine, but the ball was down in a “black hole” that I could only read by whipping out my mini-Maglite.

Since the turn gyro is mostly used for backup but the slip-skid ball is used constantly on every flight (to adjust rudder trim), I found this deficiency to be absolutely intolerable. Bottom line: I tore out the TC and installed another traditional turn-and-slip instrument. The TC now graces a knick-knack shelf at home.

If your autopilot requires a TC to function, you’re pretty well stuck with it. If it doesn’t, you might decide that an old-fashioned T&S is the better choice for your panel.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.