Aviation Groups Urge FAA to Assert Federal Authority Over Pilot Duty, Rest Rules

Aviation groups are urging the FAA to establish a uniform federal standard for flightcrew meal and rest requirements.

Shutterstock [christinarosepix]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A coalition of aviation organizations is urging the FAA to affirm federal preemption over state and local flightcrew duty and rest requirements, advocating for a uniform national standard across a broad range of operators to avoid conflicting regulations and operational difficulties.
  • The coalition argues that a national standard is crucial for managing crews, responding to disruptions, and preventing increased compliance costs and litigation risks.
  • A group of state attorneys general opposes federal preemption, asserting that these are workplace protection laws falling under state authority, not federal aviation safety regulations.
  • The state attorneys general cite a Ninth Circuit decision that found federal law did not preempt California's meal and rest breaks for flight attendants, arguing the FAA's rule should not bypass such rulings.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A coalition of aviation organizations is urging the FAA to make clear that federal regulations governing flightcrew duty and rest requirements take precedence over state and local laws.

The comments were submitted in response to an FAA proposal aimed at establishing federal preemption over state and local meal and rest requirements for airline flightcrews and flight attendants. The agency’s proposal focuses on Part 121 operations, but the aviation groups want the final rule to cover a broader range of operators.

The coalition argues that flight and duty time, rest and related requirements are areas that require a uniform national standard. Allowing individual states and local governments to impose separate requirements, the groups said, could create conflicting obligations for operators and crews that cross state lines.

The organizations also raised concerns about the potential operational consequences of differing requirements, including increased compliance costs and litigation risk. They argued that state-specific rules could make it more difficult for operators to manage crews and respond to operational disruptions or emergencies.

The coalition’s position is opposed by a group of state attorneys general, who filed separate comments urging the FAA not to preempt state meal and rest laws.

Attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia argued that the laws are primarily workplace protections rather than aviation safety regulations and therefore should remain within the states’ authority.

The states also pointed to a 2021 Ninth Circuit decision involving Virgin America. The court found that federal aviation law did not preempt California’s meal and rest break requirements for flight attendants. The attorneys general argued that the FAA’s proposed rule cannot be used to circumvent that decision.

They also rejected the FAA’s argument that state requirements would create an unworkable regulatory patchwork. The states said the laws generally establish relatively straightforward requirements, including 20- or 30-minute meal periods and, where applicable, 10-minute rest periods for each four hours worked.

The aviation coalition includes the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and Vertical Aviation International (VAI).

Amelia Walsh

Amelia Walsh is a private pilot who enjoys flying her family’s Columbia 350. She is based in Colorado and loves all things outdoors including skiing, hiking, and camping.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE