Santa Monica Airport To Impose More Fees

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Santa Monica City Council approved significantly increased landing fees for its airport, more than doubling costs for transient pilots and newly applying them to airport tenants, including flight schools.
  • Flight schools anticipate these new fees will add hundreds of dollars to pilot training costs (e.g., $12 per Cessna 172 landing) and lead to reduced airport traffic, impacting businesses and overall airport activity.
  • Aviation organizations like AOPA are strongly opposing the fee hike, disputing the city's stated need for more revenue and raising concerns about the negative impact on general aviation operations.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Residents in the urban neighborhoods that surround busy Santa Monica Airport in southern California have complained about operations there for years, citing noise, air pollution, and the danger from plane crashes, and now the city has approved new landing fees that not only more than double the fees for transient flyers, but also now apply to airport tenants, including flight schools. “Our students will go from not paying for a landing to paying about $12 for each landing in a Cessna 172,” said Jay Elder, executive vice president of the American Flyers flight school. The fee increase would add “hundreds of dollars” to each pilot’s training, he said. Transient pilots will avoid the airport because of the fee, he added, reducing traffic at the school’s pilot shop. If pilots don’t visit the shop, they won’t learn about instrument-training courses, “and it hurts the whole airport,” Elder said.

About a half dozen flight schools operate from the airport. Activists and politicians from the nearby neighborhoods, in Santa Monica and Los Angeles, have said for years they’d like to see the airport closed down. The new landing fee of $5.48 per 1,000 pounds was approved by the Santa Monica City Council on April 30, and is due to take effect Aug. 1. AOPA said it is “strongly opposed” to the changes. AOPA is disputing the plan, and has asked the airport operators to produce more financial data to support their expressed need for more revenue.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.