Duffy Floats Passenger Fee For FAA Upgrades

Transportation secretary says dedicated funding could help maintain ATC modernization.

[Credit: Ryan Ewing]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy proposed considering a new passenger fee.
  • This fee would establish a dedicated, steady revenue stream to fund ongoing FAA system upgrades and modernization efforts.
  • The goal is to ensure long-term support for aviation infrastructure, preventing systems from falling behind and reducing reliance on periodic congressional appropriations.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Wednesday that a passenger fee could be considered as a way to provide steady funding for FAA system upgrades.

Speaking at a transportation safety conference hosted by American Airlines in Fort Worth, Texas, Duffy said the nation’s aviation infrastructure needs a better way to ensure ongoing support for long-term modernization efforts beyond periodic funding from Congress. He said a dedicated revenue stream could help fund major aviation infrastructure projects and keep systems from falling behind after the current round of upgrades.

“I would welcome an opportunity to think through how [we could] have a small fee that went into us, and I want us to continually upgrade our systems,” Duffy said, according to AirlineGeeks.

He compared the idea to the September 11 Security Fee, which is added to airline tickets and currently sits at $5.60 per one-way trip originating at a U.S. airport. Duffy did not provide a proposed amount, timeline or formal plan for a new fee, and any new passenger charge would likely require congressional approval.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 4

  1. This has to be the most inefficient project in the history of federal projects and that’s saying a lot. It’s basically a career long project for some software developers amongst other things. Extend, add funding, extend……..

  2. So it is time to ask the economists if airline faire pricing is elastic or inelastic! Meaning, will more people buy airline tickets if the price goes up or not. I believe less people will buy airlines tickets if the price of a ticket goes up. Meaning Secretary Duffy is shooting himself in the foot with such a proposal. Or, specifically, airlines ticket pricing appears inelastic; or increasing pricing will put a downward direction on the number of people who fly! The airlines will probably berate Secretary Duffy for such a proposal!

  3. Avatar for 601bs 601bs says:

    So, we already pay for an inefficient, ridiculous FAA and put up with their ineptitude. Now, we will pay an extra fee to fund the ineptitude further? Why don’t we just hire someone to run the FAA that understands the issues and fixes them? Truly, aviation is getting dangerous esp for the general aviation group

  4. Avatar for JBR JBR says:

    Airline passengers already pay a 7.5% tax on tickets and a $4.10 fee per flight segment into the Airports and Aviation Trust Fund that is used to support the air traffic control system. For cargo shippers there is also a waybill tax that goes into the same fund.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.