The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is evaluating whether a proposed “triumphal arch” in Washington, D.C. could pose operational or safety risks to nearby flight operations, according to CNN, citing federal officials and internal assessments.
The structure, backed by President Donald Trump’s administration, would be located less than two miles from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) and within one of the most tightly controlled and complex airspace environments in the country.
According to reports, the FAA has been asked to assess whether the planned monument—described as an approximately 250-foot arch—could create hazards for arrival and departure paths, particularly given its proximity to established procedures in the National Capital Region airspace.
Officials familiar with the review say the agency’s analysis is focused on obstruction clearance standards, potential impacts on instrument procedures, and any effects on helicopter routes that routinely operate in and out of the Washington area.
The review comes amid broader scrutiny of Washington-area airspace management following last year’s midair collision between an American Airlines regional jet and an Army Black Hawk helicopter.
At this stage, the FAA assessment is understood to be preliminary, and no final determination has been made regarding whether the project would require design modifications, height restrictions, or additional mitigation measures.
The FAA has not announced a timeline for completing its review.
I think all class B airports are fairly “tightly controlled and complex”, and NYC airspace is much more worthy of this line.
This article (intentional or not) screams “shock value” and all I gathered was “Trump wants to build something RIGHT IN THE WAY OF DCA AIRPLANES!!!”
You said it at the end, its preliminary. Relax. If they need to change anything they will. Maybe the news is that someone is actually talking to the FAA to notify them of building something, unlike the people who build these invisible radio towers every year in the path of low alt military routes.
Edit:Spelling
Another case of tRump stroking his teeny tiny … ego. This is more retarded than his ball room (I wonder if he knows that means dancing - bazinga) but not as stupid as his battleship idea!
As long as the Arch is sunken; so as not to create an aircraft traffic hazard; no one should be concerned. If actually above ground, it would be a not, not!! Being that close to airports. So the architects need to be given direction by the FAA, sunken structures only. And the public would likely prefer a sunken arch which can be seen without looking up!