NTSB Calls For FAA Update To Runway Condition Matrix

Recommendations follow wet-runway overrun investigations.

NTSB Calls For FAA Update To Runway Condition Matrix
Miami Air Flight 293 overran Runway 10 at Jacksonville Naval Air Station during heavy rains on May 3, 2019. [Credit: NTSB]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The NTSB recommended that the FAA revise its Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM) to better account for braking performance during heavy rainfall, following investigations into 11 runway overrun incidents.
  • The current RCAM does not adequately factor in the progressive loss of wheel braking friction associated with increasing rainfall intensity, which impacts landing distance calculations.
  • The NTSB also recommended that the FAA add more detailed rainfall intensity descriptors to aviation weather reports, as current reporting doesn't identify rates above the "heavy rain" threshold, which have been significantly exceeded in past incidents.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on Tuesday recommended that the FAA revise its runway condition assessment matrix, or RCAM, to better account for braking performance during periods of heavy rainfall.

According to the NTSB, the recommendations follow investigations into 11 runway overrun accidents and incidents between 2008 and 2022 involving landings on wet runways. The agency said the current RCAM does not account for the progressive loss of wheel braking friction associated with increasing rainfall intensity, which can affect landing distance calculations.

The NTSB is also recommending that the FAA add more rainfall intensity descriptors to aviation weather reports. The agency said current weather reporting does not identify rainfall rates above the existing heavy rain threshold of 0.3 inches per hour.

In the 2019 Miami Air Flight 293 overrun at Jacksonville Naval Air Station, for example, rainfall rates were found to be between two and eight times that threshold. The Boeing 737 departed the end of Runway 10 and came to rest in shallow water in the St. Johns River.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 2

  1. Thrust reversers!!! Landing on: ice, heavy rain, or anything else that makes a runway slick; thrust reversers are necessary! The pilots should have been ready for a slick runway landing using their thrust reversers! An oil spill on a runway also probably needs thrust reversers. Talking around an issue without talking about the details is offensive! Wake up!!!

  2. Thrust reversers are over rated. Pilots need to pay attention to the contaminated runway performance numbers and actually follow them. You would be amazed at how much water, ice, or snow on runway will dramatically increase takeoff and landing numbers on jets with 100kt+ takeoff or landing speeds. Whether grooved or not makes a big difference as well. No matter how detailed the Matrix is, it does no good if pilots don’t follow the performance charts for those conditions!

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.