ELT Short Circuit Caused 787 Fire At Heathrow

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A short circuit in the lithium battery-powered ELT was the probable cause of a fire in a parked Boeing 787 at London's Heathrow Airport in July 2013, causing substantial damage.
  • Investigators determined that exposed wires touched, igniting the fire which spread among battery cells and was unexpectedly intensified by insulation trapping heat.
  • The incident raised concerns about potential in-flight fires, which would be difficult to manage and could lead to cabin fumes or depressurization, despite limited spread at altitude.
  • The findings prompted the FAA to plan an evaluation of the flammability testing procedures used to certify the Boeing 787, as tests did not anticipate insulation trapping heat and spreading fire.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A short circuit was the probable cause of the fire that started in a Boeing 787 parked at London’s Heathrow Airport in July 2013, U.K. investigators said this week. Two exposed wires in the aircraft’s lithium battery-powered ELT touched, starting the fire and causing substantial damage to the 787, the Air Accidents Investigations Branch said in a BBC report. Heathrow was closed for about 90 minutes and no one was injured. The result of the short circuit was unexpected as testing indicated such an occurrence would run down the batteries, the report said. Instead, the fire ignited and spread among the battery cells, and insulation helped it build inside the aircraft, investigators determined.

It’s unknown what could have occurred if the fire began in flight, the AAIB said in the BBC report. While temperatures at altitude would have limited the fire, it would have been difficult for the crew to locate and manage. The fuselage likely would have kept its integrity, but fumes in the cabin or depressurization would have been possible, the investigations branch said. The agency’s finding’s prompted the FAA to plan an evaluation of the flammability testing procedures used to certify the Boeing 787, according to a Seattle Times report. Quoting an unnamed official, the Times said tests didn’t anticipate that flame-resistant insulation in the aircraft could “trap the heat and energy” as it did in the Heathrow incident, allowing a fire to spread and burn the composite structure.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.