House Addresses FAA Sleep Apnea Policy

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The U.S. House of Representatives has introduced a bill requiring the FAA to follow normal rulemaking procedures and public comment before imposing new policies on pilot girth, medical testing, and sleep apnea.
  • Pilot organizations like AOPA and EAA strongly oppose the FAA's policy, which automatically refers pilots with a BMI of 40 or greater to a medical specialist, arguing it is arbitrary, outside the Flight Surgeon's mandate, and unsupported by general aviation accident data.
  • AOPA estimates the FAA's policy could add significantly to the special issuance medical backlog and impose a financial burden of $99 million to $347 million on the pilot community.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The U.S. House of Representatives has created a bill that would require the FAA to open a public comment period and apply normal rulemaking procedures before imposing new policy regarding pilot girth, medical testing, and sleep apnea. AOPA and EAA reacted to the announced policy with strongly worded letters demanding that it be suspended. They argued that the policy addresses a problem that exceeds the Federal Flight Surgeons mandate, could add a financial burden to the pilot community, and hasnt been proven to exist. AOPA Thursday expressed its support for the Houses legislation and added some choice words.

AOPA president Mark Baker said, The policy change is arbitrary and capricious and doesnt make sense given the data. AOPA says that a review of ten years worth of general aviation accident data found no cases in which sleep apnea was a causal or contributing factor. The policy itself specifies that pilots or controllers with a body mass index of 40 or greater be automatically referred to a medical specialist. AOPA argues that the policy will add to a 55,000-case backlog of special issuance medicals and collectively cost pilots anywhere from $99 million to $347 million in new medical fees. As written, the House legislation ensures that any new or revised requirement be adopted pursuant to rulemaking proceeding. Each sponsoring member of the House is a member of the General Aviation Caucus.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.