Pilot v. Airline Case Goes To Supreme Court

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • After pilot William Hoeper was fired, his former employer Air Wisconsin alerted the TSA that he might be armed and mentally unstable as he boarded a commercial flight, leading to his detention.
  • A Colorado court ruled in Hoeper's favor, but Air Wisconsin appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing for legal immunity when reporting perceived air-safety concerns, even if they are later proven false.
  • The Supreme Court justices appeared concerned that Air Wisconsin may have overstepped but also want to avoid discouraging airlines from reporting troubling behavior.
  • A complete victory for Hoeper is considered unlikely, with the Court's decision expected in June.
See a mistake? Contact us.

After an Air Wisconsin pilot was fired from his job and boarded a commercial flight to go home, his former employers alerted the TSA that he might be armed and mentally unstable, launching a legal dispute that made it to the Supreme Court this week. William Hoeper was fired in 2004 after he failed several simulator tests. Both sides agree he was upset, yelled at the instructor, and said he would complain to his union about unfair treatment. After dropping him off at the airport to catch a United flight, Air Wisconsin officials grew concerned and called the TSA. Hoeper was taken off his flight and detained. A Colorado court ruled in Hoeper’s favor, but the airline appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming it should have legal immunity if it raises what it believes to be legitimate air-safety concerns, even if they turn out to be false.

According to Pete Williams, an NBC News correspondent who was present at the justices’ debate, the court was concerned that Air Wisconsin had gone too far, but “seemed to be searching for a way to rule without discouraging other airlines from reporting behavior they find troubling.” A total victory for Hoeper appears “unlikely,” Williams said. The Court is not expected to announce a decision in the case until June. A complete transcript of the court’s discussion (PDF) is posted online.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.