FAA Reinterprets Maintenance Rule, Aircraft Owners Benefit

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA clarified that "current" maintenance standards for multiengine turboprops and turbine aircraft refer to the standards in effect when the owner adopts the maintenance program, not necessarily the latest updates.
  • Aircraft owners are not obligated to comply with manufacturer maintenance updates unless mandated by the FAA through an AD or rule amendment.
  • This ruling is particularly beneficial for owners of older aircraft, potentially saving them from costly and extensive retrofitting to meet newer maintenance standards.
  • AOPA advises owners to consult with experienced mechanics to determine the appropriate inspection program based on factors like aircraft history and owner familiarity.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A review by the FAA about what the word “current” really means in a regulation regarding maintenance of multiengine turboprops and turbine-powered aircraft is good news for owners and operators, AOPA said this week. The legal interpretation arose from a question regarding whether an aircraft operator is obliged to comply with the maintenance standards that were in place when the aircraft was manufactured or with updated maintenance instructions. Although the industry has historically interpreted the rule to mean that the latest standards must be applied, the new interpretation says the operator is not obliged to do so. The FAA notice says an operator needs only to adopt a manufacturer’s inspection program that is “current” as of the time he adopts it, and that program remains “current” unless the FAA mandates revisions to it. Such a mandate would be adopted in the form of either an AD or an amendment to the operating rules.

“By extension, this interpretation applies to ANY aircraft,” says AVweb‘s Savvy Aviator columnist Mike Busch. “What it means is that no change that the manufacturer makes to its maintenance manual or ICA subsequent to aircraft delivery or STC installation is compulsory UNLESS it is explicitly FAA-approved.” AOPA says the FAA’s review is particularly good news for owners of Cessna 425 and 441 Conquests, which were built 20 to 30 years ago. Recently, these owners were facing the possibility of having to comply with extremely invasive inspections, including the removal of the aircraft’s wings, because of multiple updates to Cessna’s maintenance program, AOPA said. They now can comply with the maintenance program in place at the time their airplanes were built.

“Owners need to spend time talking to the mechanics who’ve worked on their aircraft to decide what type of inspections to have performed,” said Rob Hackman, AOPA senior director of regulatory affairs. “Owners should consider many factors, including the aircraft’s history, total time, how long they’ve owned it, how familiar they are with its maintenance, and the information they gather from those who have completed the inspections in making their decisions.” For more info about this topic, click here for a PDF of the FAA’s notice, and click here for AOPA’s explanation.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.