House Aims To Cut FAA Funding

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The U.S. House and Senate are considering legislation to revert FAA funding to 2008 levels, aiming for a $4 billion cut through identified cost savings, while still providing funding for NextGen.
  • The FAA administrator warns these proposed cuts could slow NextGen deployment, and the House version specifically could significantly impact small airports.
  • A controversial provision in the House proposal seeks to eliminate the Essential Air Service program, which subsidizes over 100 smaller airports, and this is expected to face strong opposition in the Senate.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The House of Representatives and the Senate are both considering legislation that would roll back funding of the FAA to 2008 levels, but still provide funding toward NextGen, according to a Reuters report, Friday. Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Rep. John Mica, said in a statement that the proposal “increases the efficiency and effectiveness of our aviation programs.” The plan reportedly seeks to cut $4 billion out of the FAA’s funding through cost savings found in programs that the FAA will be asked to identify and that do not impact safety. FAA administrator Randy Babbitt said the cuts would further slow the deployment of NextGen. And, as worded, the House version could have a large impact on small airports.

NextGen is currently consuming about $1 billion per year and that spending had been expected to continue through 2018. While the proposed funding cuts may be controversial, the legislation also includes another provision that’s almost sure to earn some enemies. The House proposal would kill the Essential Air Service program. That program subsidizes air services at more than 100 smaller airports — and any proposal that cuts it is not expected to pass through the Senate.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE