Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A pilot recounts an experience with an RDU air traffic controller known for his exceptionally precise, "robotic" communication style.
  • During an instrument approach, the controller ironically issued an instruction using the wrong call sign for the pilot's aircraft, shortly after warning about a similar-sounding plane.
  • After the pilot did not respond, the controller broke his rigid cadence to acknowledge and express frustration over his own error.
  • The incident revealed the controller's human fallibility, providing "vindication" for the pilot who had previously perceived him as overly correct.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A while back, a controller at RDU International spoke in a robotic Cylon voice, using all official phraseology including “tree” and “fife” for “3” and “5.” We though he was trying to show everyone up and be a model of correctness.

One night, I was practicing instrument approaches with a safety pilot, and that controller called us with a familiar warning:
“N1234A, be advised of a similar sounding call sign, N1234B.”

He gave the other aircraft a similar call, then promptly gave me an instruction with the wrong call sign.

I wasn’t completely sure, so I didn’t respond. The other aircraft didn’t either.

After a pregnant pause, the controller called me with the correct N-number:
“Did I use the wrong call sign?”

Whereby I responded:
“Yes. Yes, sir, you did.”

He broke his robotic cadence into a friendly whine:
“Awwwwwwww, I hate it when I do that.”

We felt vindicated!


Dan K.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE