Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A Cessna pilot experienced difficulties with an inconsistent transponder while requesting flight following, leading to troubleshooting efforts with air traffic control.
  • After the transponder issue was resolved, the pilot comically misunderstood the controller's request for "type," initially responding with a frustrated, expletive-laden complaint about their "piece-of-crap" transponder before clarifying they meant the aircraft type (Skyhawk).
  • An editor's note explains an intentional error in the genericized squawk codes (including an invalid '8') which was kept in the archive for its humor and reader engagement.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Overheard one evening as a Fayetteville, North Carolina controller was working with a Cessna that was requesting flight following. The Cessna had problems with a fussy transponder and the controller was attempting to help. After several exchanges:

Tower:
“N1234, I’m still getting an inconsistent transponder return. Confirm squawking 4567.”

Cessna:
“N1234 squawking 4567.”

Tower:
“N1234, transponder return is still inconsistent. Try squawking 5678.”

Cessna:
“N1234 squawking 5678.”

Tower:
“N1234, I have a good return now. Could you say the type?”

Cessna:
“N1234. It’s a piece-of-crap [redacted] transponder. Don’t ever buy one.”

… long pause …

Cessna:
“Oh, you meant the aircraft. Skyhawk.”

Tower keyed the microphone, but only laughter came through.


Glenn Holden
via e-mail


Editor’s Note:
Yes, we know there’s no “8” to squawk. The error crept in when we genericized the numbers for publication, and we’ve left it here in the archive. If nothing else, it generated some great e-mail – this one being our favorite.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE