Airport Spared Compost

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Palo Alto city officials' plan to establish a composting facility on four acres of airport land faced significant opposition.
  • The FAA objected to the proposal, citing potential violations of agreements related to federal airport funding, while local pilots raised concerns about birds attracted to the waste creating a flight hazard.
  • The city council ultimately voted to reconsider the airport site, making its use for the composting facility unlikely.
  • However, alternative locations for the composting facility, such as designated park land, are also proving controversial.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The FAA says an airport is a rotten place to put a composting facility, and Palo Alto, Calif. officials have grudgingly agreed. Last Monday, Palo Alto city council voted 6-3 to rethink plans to use four acres of airport land as a processing site for the area’s kitchen scraps and lawn clippings. However, it wasn’t until the FAA told council that the facility would run afoul of agreements regarding the federal money that has been spent at the airport over the years that the city decided to look for greener pastures. Local pilots had also rallied to fight the proposal.

Dozens of pilots were in council chambers to hear discussion and witness the vote, which doesn’t actually kill the airport proposal but does make it seem unlikely. The pilots were especially concerned about the birds that would be attracted by the piles of rotting waste. Although the airport plan raised a ruckus, the next best alternative seems destined to cause just as much controversy: The compost could end up going on land designated for a park.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE