Northrop Grumman Sued Over Mallard Crash

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Northrop Grumman is being sued by Chalk's Ocean Airways and its insurer AIG for a manufacturing defect in a 58-year-old Grumman Mallard involved in a fatal 2005 crash.
  • The lawsuit alleges a hidden defect with rivets in an uninspectable area where the wing attached to the fuselage led to the aircraft's right wing shearing off in flight, killing all 20 aboard.
  • While the NTSB blamed faulty maintenance and Chalk's failure to spot fatigue cracks, the plaintiffs argue the problem was an uninspectable manufacturing flaw, making maintenance impossible to prevent it.
  • The accident resulted in Chalk's Ocean Airways ceasing operations and AIG paying out $50 million in claims.
See a mistake? Contact us.

It’s not often that a manufacturer is sued for allegedly defective products it hasn’t built in almost 60 years but that’s where Northrop Grumman finds itself. Chalk’s Ocean Airways and its insurer AIG is suing the company over the crash of one of Chalk’s Grumman Mallards in December of 2005, claiming the 58-year-old aircraft wasn’t properly made. “There was a manufacturing problem with the rivets,” Chalk’s attorney John Eversole told the Miami Herald. “Our allegations are that there was a weak area where the wings are attached to the fuselage, an area that could lead to weakness if under stress. This area is enclosed and cannot be inspected. The metal is built around the area where this wing sheared off…” The right wing on Chalk’s Mallard came off in flight and the resulting crash killed all 20 aboard. The Herald said Northrop Grumman declined comment on the suit.

Chalk’s never recovered from the accident and its operating certificate was pulled in November of 2007. AIG paid out $50 million in claims. The NTSB blamed faulty maintenance and Chalk’s failure to spot the fatigue cracks that caused the accident but Eversole said there was nothing anyone could have done to spot the problem. “We think the NTSB was way too quick to blame Chalk’s for maintenance when there is no maintenance that can be done with this area,” he said. “You can’t inspect it, you can’t perform maintenance on it. There is nothing you can do short of rebuilding the airplane.”

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE