Arizona Senators Seek Changes To Phoenix Flight Path Plan

Kelly and Gallego cited GA departure procedures, established noise gates and projected community impacts.

Arizona Senators Seek Changes To Phoenix Flight Path Plan
[Credit: Robin Guess | Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Arizona Senators Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego have urged the FAA to revise its Phoenix Area Modernization Project, citing significant adverse effects on neighborhoods and airports due to proposed new flight procedures.
  • The senators are concerned that new standard instrument departures would not require aircraft to follow established noise-abatement gates, potentially increasing noise for over 86,000 people, with many experiencing a rise of at least 5 decibels.
  • They requested a new draft environmental assessment, retention of existing noise-abatement gates or introduction of dispersed routing, and a meeting with FAA leadership before the project, already delayed until June 2027, is finalized.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Arizona Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego on Aug. 5 asked the FAA to revise its Phoenix Area Modernization Project before implementing new flight procedures. The proposal covers Phoenix Sky Harbor International and several surrounding airports, including changes that would affect general aviation, turboprop and small commuter aircraft.

“While we share the goals of ensuring a safe and efficient airspace in the Phoenix area, we are concerned that the FAA’s proposed flight procedure changes will have significant adverse effects for neighborhoods, communities, and airports across the Phoenix area,” the senators wrote in a letter to FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford.

They requested another draft environmental assessment that responds to comments submitted during the recently closed public review period.

GA Departure Procedures

The proposal includes new standard instrument departures at Sky Harbor for aircraft categorized as Group B. The senators said those procedures would not require aircraft to follow established noise-abatement gates. They asked the FAA to retain the gates or introduce dispersed and rotational routing. The letter also requests changes to a proposed northbound departure from Mesa Gateway Airport and greater route dispersion for Scottsdale Airport traffic.

“Ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of the national airspace system is critical,” the senators wrote. “However, such efforts must account for the impacts that flight routing decisions have on affected communities, recognize and respect prior arrangements reached between the FAA and affected communities regarding noise impacts, and meaningfully incorporate community feedback.”

Their letter cites FAA data estimating reportable noise increases for 86,384 people. Of that group, 65,475 could experience increases of at least 5 decibels.

Implementation Delayed Until 2027

The FAA says the proposed Performance-Based Navigation procedures are intended to improve safety and air traffic efficiency. The agency moved the project’s target implementation date to June 10, 2027, following feedback from residents and local agencies.

Kelly and Gallego also requested continued protection for Sky Harbor’s 43rd Avenue and 4DME noise-abatement gates and a meeting with FAA leadership before the plan is finalized.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 2

  1. You let city growth build up around these airports and the put the aircraft in danger by requiring reduced power takeoffs. general aviation always suffers when the cities encroach into airport surroundings. Then the cries come to close down the airports which were there first. I blame politicians for this problem, most who are not pilots and side with the cities.

  2. It’s amazing how these politicians loudly complain about how behind and outdated our ATC system is. Then when updates or more efficient changes are planned or implemented, all of a sudden the noise complaints start. No matter who is in office, you just can’t win.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.