Flight School Faces $2.4M Fine Over Temperature Gauge

FAA alleges unapproved temperature gauge rendered Cessna 172 unairworthy for approximately 280 flights.

FAA Proposes $2.39 Million Fine Against Flight School
[Credit: PJ McDonnell | Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA proposed a nearly $2.4 million civil penalty against Stratus Aviation LLC (Wings Flight School) for allegedly operating an unairworthy aircraft.
  • The alleged violation involved a Cessna 172M Skyhawk, which reportedly had an unapproved temperature gauge installed in October 2022.
  • Wings Flight School is accused of operating this unairworthy aircraft on approximately 280 flights between February 2023 and September 2024.
  • The proposed penalty is not yet final, with the school given 30 days to respond to the FAA's notice.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The FAA proposed a $2,388,500 civil penalty Friday against Stratus Aviation LLC, which operates Wings Flight School in Vacaville, California, for allegedly operating an unairworthy aircraft. According to the FAA’s announcement, the violations involved a Cessna 172M Skyhawk used by the flight training provider.

The FAA says the school installed an unapproved temperature gauge in the aircraft in October 2022 that rendered it unairworthy. The agency did not specify which temperature the gauge measured or provide further details about the installation.

Nearly 280 Flights Alleged

According to the FAA, Wings went on to operate the aircraft on approximately 280 flights between February 2023 and September 2024. The agency alleges those flights were conducted in a careless or reckless manner that endangered lives or property. The announcement did not identify any resulting accidents or injuries.

Wings operates from Nut Tree Airport (VCB) in Vacaville and offers private, instrument and commercial pilot training, including FAA-approved Part 141 programs listed on its website.

School Given 30 Days to Respond

Wings has 30 days after receiving the FAA’s notice to respond to the proposed penalty. The agency has not announced a final determination, and the $2.39 million penalty remains subject to the enforcement process.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.