Parachute Group Opposes Extra Maintenance, Training Proposal

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The U.S. Parachute Association (USPA) opposes a Senate bill included in the FAA Reauthorization, arguing it creates needless expense and redundant regulations for jump zone operators and pilots without enhancing safety.
  • Key provisions opposed include additional annual recurrency training for jump pilots and mandatory engine overhauls at manufacturer-suggested TBOs, which the USPA believes will hinder pilot recruitment and assign regulatory power to manufacturers.
  • The bill, inspired by a fatal 2019 Hawaii crash, rehashes NTSB recommendations from 2008 that were previously rejected by the FAA for similar reasons, despite the industry's improved safety record since.
  • While the House's version of the reauthorization bill does not include these provisions, the Senate version is still under debate with some members opposing the parachute-specific clauses.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The U.S. Parachute Association says a bill included in the Senate’s version of the next FAA Reauthorization will create needless expense and red tape for the industry. USPA Executive Director Albert Berchtold told AVweb in an interview that the Air Tour and Sport Parachuting Improvement Act of 2023, sponsored by Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz, will burden jump zone operators without improving safety. “It will create redundant regulation that doesn’t solve the problem,” said Berchtold.

Under Schatz’s bill, jump pilots would have to undergo additional annual recurrency sessions “that address, at a minimum, operation- and aircraft-specific weight and balance calculations, preflight inspections, emergency and recovery procedures, and parachutist egress procedures for each type of aircraft flown.” Berchtold said commercial pilots are already trained and must demonstrate proficiency in all those skills and requiring extra training and testing will be another barrier to attracting new pilots to jump zones.

The bill would also require operators to overhaul engines and other life-limited components at the manufacturer’s suggested TBO and not be permitted to fly on condition as approved by maintenance professionals. Berchtold said that aspect essentially assigns a regulatory mandate to the manufacturers.

Berchtold said Schatz’s bill is a rehash of recommendations from the NTSB that were rejected by the FAA in 2008 when the board addressed drop zone safety issues. He said the FAA and USPA acted on other NTSB recommendations at the time but opposed these because of the same reasons he’s now citing. Berchtold said the industry is already amply regulated and he would rather see an emphasis on enforcing existing regulations. He also said the industry’s safety record has improved since the 2008 recommendations from the NTSB, but a major crash in Hawaii in 2019 marred that record.

Berchtold said Schatz’s bill was apparently inspired by the crash of the jump zone King Air from Dillingham Airport in Hawaii in 2019 that killed all 11 onboard. The NTSB found the aircraft stalled after an aggressive takeoff. It also found that previous unrepaired damage from a stall/spin accident in the crash plane left it with a twisted wing that may have contributed to the loss of control.

The House’s version of the reauthorization bill does not include these provisions and was passed in August. The Senate is expected to mark up its version of reauthorization next week, and Berchtold said there is opposition to the parachute provisions from some members.

Russ Niles

Russ Niles is Editor-in-Chief of AVweb. He has been a pilot for 30 years and joined AVweb 22 years ago. He and his wife Marni live in southern British Columbia where they also operate a small winery.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.