Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • An air traffic controller, known for his overly precise and robotic communication style, was initially perceived as trying to be a model of correctness.
  • Despite warning two aircraft about their similar call signs, the controller immediately made an error, issuing an instruction to the wrong aircraft.
  • Upon correction, the controller broke his robotic cadence to express human frustration, revealing that even seemingly perfect controllers make mistakes, which "vindicated" the author.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A while back, a controller at RDU International spoke in a robotic Cylon voice, using all official phraseology including “tree” and “fife” for “3” and “5.” We though he was trying to show everyone up and be a model of correctness.

One night, I was practicing instrument approaches with a safety pilot, and that controller called us with a familiar warning:
“N1234A, be advised of a similar sounding call sign, N1234B.”

He gave the other aircraft a similar call, then promptly gave me an instruction with the wrong call sign.

I wasn’t completely sure, so I didn’t respond. The other aircraft didn’t either.

After a pregnant pause, the controller called me with the correct N-number:
“Did I use the wrong call sign?”

Whereby I responded:
“Yes. Yes, sir, you did.”

He broke his robotic cadence into a friendly whine:
“Awwwwwwww, I hate it when I do that.”

We felt vindicated!


Dan K.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.