Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A pilot initially perceived an air traffic controller as overly rigid and precise in their communication.
  • Despite warning the pilot about a similar call sign, the controller subsequently made an error by using the wrong call sign for an instruction.
  • When corrected, the controller dropped their robotic demeanor and expressed frustration, revealing a human side and vindicating the pilot's initial skepticism.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A while back, a controller at RDU International spoke in a robotic Cylon voice, using all official phraseology including “tree” and “fife” for “3” and “5.” We though he was trying to show everyone up and be a model of correctness.

One night, I was practicing instrument approaches with a safety pilot, and that controller called us with a familiar warning:
“N1234A, be advised of a similar sounding call sign, N1234B.”

He gave the other aircraft a similar call, then promptly gave me an instruction with the wrong call sign.

I wasn’t completely sure, so I didn’t respond. The other aircraft didn’t either.

After a pregnant pause, the controller called me with the correct N-number:
“Did I use the wrong call sign?”

Whereby I responded:
“Yes. Yes, sir, you did.”

He broke his robotic cadence into a friendly whine:
“Awwwwwwww, I hate it when I do that.”

We felt vindicated!


Dan K.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.