Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A pilot (N1234) mistakenly used the aviation term "flight of two" to indicate two people on board their single aircraft.
  • Air Traffic Control (ATC) repeatedly questioned this, clarifying that "flight of two" means two separate aircraft flying together.
  • The misunderstanding led to confusion, requiring ATC to correct the pilot's flight plan to "two souls on board" instead of "flight of two."
See a mistake? Contact us.

Saturday, December 6, approximately 18:00 local time, I am sitting on the ramp at KTMB waiting on an IFR clearance. Here is the conversation I hear:

N1234:
“Tamiami Ground, N1234 at T hangar, ready for taxi.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, I don’t see you. Taxi up to and hold short of taxiway E.”

[pause]

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, I see you now. Confirm you are a flight of two.”

N1234:
“Affirmative. I am a flight of two.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, taxi E to 9R; cleared to cross 31.”

N1234:
“N1234 taxiing E to 9R. Cleared to cross 31.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, I confirm you are a flight of two.”

N1234:
“Affirmative. I am a flight of two.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, I only see one of you.”

N1234:
“Of course you only see one. My cabin windows are tinted. There are two of us in here.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, ‘a flight of two’ means there are two aircraft.”

N1234:
“How could I fly two planes?”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, ‘a flight of two’ means there are two aircraft and one pilot is talking for both aircraft.”

N1234:
“No. There is just my plane, with two people inside.”

KTMB Ground:
“N1234, you should have filed ‘two souls on board’ and not put ‘flight of two’ in the remarks. I will adjust your flight plan.”

N1234:
“Sorry. Thanks.”


Jeff Mayerle

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.