Short Final

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Air traffic control (both Approach and Tower) failed to proactively gather or provide crucial real-time information regarding preceding aircraft's breakout conditions during marginal weather.
  • The pilot demonstrated good airmanship by actively seeking vital information from ATC and, upon successfully landing just above minimums, proactively reported their own breakout altitude.
  • ATC's responses suggested a casual attitude towards collecting and sharing specific breakout information, despite the challenging IFR conditions.
See a mistake? Contact us.
Overheard in IFR Magazine's 'On the Air' Section
Overheard in IFR Magazine‘s “On the Air”

I was en route to a New England airport famous for its fog. The ATIS reported below minimums but gradual ix, improving. Approach said to expect the ILS, and I could hear one aircraft ahead, a local airliner. Approach cleared me for the approach and sent the other aircraft to tower.

Me:
“Did the aircraft ahead get in?”

Approach:
“Well, he didn’t fly the missed. Contact tower.”

Me:
“Tower, at what altitude did the previous plane break out?”

[pause]

Tower:
“I didn’t ask.”

Me (after landing a little proudly):
“Tower, be advised that we broke out just above minimums.”

Tower:
“Everybody does.”

John Ward
via e-mail

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.