Airport Spared Compost

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Palo Alto's plan to build a composting facility on airport land faced significant opposition from the FAA and local pilots.
  • The FAA opposed the facility due to potential violations of federal funding agreements, while pilots were concerned about the rotting waste attracting birds and increasing strike risks.
  • The city council voted to rethink the airport location under FAA pressure, making the initial proposal unlikely, but the alternative site on park land is also proving controversial.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The FAA says an airport is a rotten place to put a composting facility, and Palo Alto, Calif. officials have grudgingly agreed. Last Monday, Palo Alto city council voted 6-3 to rethink plans to use four acres of airport land as a processing site for the area’s kitchen scraps and lawn clippings. However, it wasn’t until the FAA told council that the facility would run afoul of agreements regarding the federal money that has been spent at the airport over the years that the city decided to look for greener pastures. Local pilots had also rallied to fight the proposal.

Dozens of pilots were in council chambers to hear discussion and witness the vote, which doesn’t actually kill the airport proposal but does make it seem unlikely. The pilots were especially concerned about the birds that would be attracted by the piles of rotting waste. Although the airport plan raised a ruckus, the next best alternative seems destined to cause just as much controversy: The compost could end up going on land designated for a park.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE