TEB Challenger Crash Forces Questions…

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A chartered Canadair Challenger 600 crashed on Feb. 2, 2005, during takeoff from Teterboro Airport, rolling off the runway, across a highway, and into a warehouse.
  • The incident resulted in injuries and a total loss of the aircraft but no fatalities, raising questions about chartered aircraft safety and the Challenger series' operation.
  • The crash prompted official interest from the NTSB and FAA, leading to planned meetings to discuss improvements in pilot training and decision-making skills.
  • Initial, unofficial speculation suggests airframe icing or a pitch-control problem may have been factors preventing rotation.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The fiery Feb. 2, 2005, crash of a chartered Canadair Challenger 600-1A11 attempting to depart the Teterboro (N.J.) Airport (TEB) is raising a lot of questions about chartered aircraft safety in general and, specifically, how aircraft in the Challenger series are flown. In addition to an NTSB “go” team, official government interest includes a planned Feb. 18 meeting between FAA and industry officials to discuss ways to improve pilot training and decision-making skills. Most important, though, is the question of why there has been a string of highly visible business aircraft crashes in recent months and what can be done about them. While the Feb. 2 TEB crash did not result in fatalities, it was a near thing. The jet — with two flight crewmembers, a flight attendant and eight passengers — was attempting to take off from Runway 6. Instead, it rolled off the departure end of the runway, through a fence, across a six-lane highway and into a warehouse. The worst injuries were to the co-pilot — a broken leg — and to a motorist, but the airplane was heavily damaged by a post-crash fire and is considered a total loss. Weather at the time was clear but cold, fueling speculation of an icing-related cause. While it will be months before the NTSB issues its probable-cause statement, various unofficial reports include speculation that airframe ice was a factor and that there may have been a pitch-control problem that prevented rotation.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.