TSA To Leave Most GA Security To GA?

Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The TSA is reportedly abandoning its 2008 plans to impose new security regulations requiring special measures and screening for general aviation (GA) aircraft and operators.
  • This reversal is a result of extensive industry opposition and the TSA's decision to foster cooperation with the GA sector rather than pursue a "combative back and forth."
  • The revised strategy will largely leave security for smaller aircraft to the judgment of pilots and operators, while stricter regulations will apply to a higher class of larger aircraft, sparing hundreds of smaller airports from costly new burdens.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Reports surfaced Friday that the TSA is backing off of plans to create regulations proposed in 2008 that would have required operators of general aviation aircraft to provide special security measures and screen people and cargo. The agency is now said to be leaning toward leaving security mostly to the judgment of pilots and operators. According to NPR, the general aviation industry, an industry “worth $150 billion a year,” sent regulators “thousands of complaints.” As a result, the TSA has concluded it will make better progress working with the industry than moving ahead with a “combative back and forth.” In a revised security plan expected this fall, the TSA is now expected to increase the size of aircraft that must adhere to stricter regulation (presumably above the previously suggested 12,500 pound limit) and leave the security of smaller aircraft largely in the hands of the pilots who fly them. News reports Friday stated that the changes would spare hundreds of smaller airports from the burdens of costly security programs, personnel and equipment.

The TSA had originally thought to create security regulations for smaller airports and aircraft through the logic that improved security at the airlines would drive potential evil-doers to smaller, less-regulated aircraft. However, industry advocates responded that the personal nature of general aviation was, in itself, a level of security and that regulation would add cost burdens and inconveniences, crippling the industry without adding significant security benefits.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE