Texas Airport Weighs $500 Self-Fueling Permit

Proposed fees would affect pilots bringing outside fuel onto airport property, including mogas and unleaded avgas.

Texas Airport Weighs $500 Self-Fueling Permit
[Credit: ANDY_GK | Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A.L. Mangham Jr. Regional Airport (OCH) is considering new fees, including a $500 annual permit and a 20-cent-per-gallon charge, for aircraft owners bringing outside fuel onto airport property for self-fueling.
  • This proposal comes after the airport shelved plans to offer unleaded aviation fuel due to high investment costs and uncertain financial viability.
  • The Nacogdoches Airport Advisory Board reviewed the proposed ordinance but raised concerns about its potential disproportionate impact on individual and light-sport aircraft owners, requesting revisions like tiered fee structures or exemptions.
See a mistake? Contact us.

A city-owned airport in East Texas is considering a $500 annual permit and a 20-cent-per-gallon fee for aircraft owners who bring fuel purchased elsewhere onto airport property to fuel their own airplanes. The proposal comes as officials at A.L. Mangham Jr. Regional Airport (OCH) have put plans to offer unleaded aviation fuel on hold.

The Nacogdoches Airport Advisory Board reviewed the proposed ordinance changes Tuesday, Oct. 27, but requested revisions after members raised concerns about the potential impact on individual aircraft owners.

During the same meeting, airport officials said they had evaluated adding a third fuel storage tank to sell unleaded avgas, initially anticipating that a local flight school would be the primary customer. Officials discussed tank costs ranging from approximately $230,000 to $270,000 and cited concerns about the expense and availability of unleaded fuel. Airport Manager Eric Forester said the investment did not currently make financial sense, and the city has shelved the project for now.

The airport currently offers 24-hour self-service 100LL and Jet A fueling. Pilots whose aircraft are approved to use other fuels, including automotive gasoline (mogas) or unleaded avgas, would have to obtain those fuels elsewhere. Bringing them onto airport property would fall under the proposed permit requirements.

Proposed Fees Draw Questions

The proposed ordinance would amend the city’s existing aviation regulations and master fee schedule. In addition to the annual permit and fuel-flowage charges, applicants would be required to carry at least $1 million in general liability insurance, maintain fuel records and conduct fueling operations in designated areas. Purchases from the airport’s existing self-service pumps would not be subject to the new permit requirements.

“They’re bringing two jugs in,” one meeting participant said, referring to light-sport aircraft with fuel tanks holding approximately 10 to 12 gallons. “They’re filling it up. They’re going flying.”

Members discussed whether the proposed requirements could disproportionately affect pilots who bring small quantities of fuel onto the airport, including owners of light-sport aircraft and airplanes capable of using mogas.

“I don’t want to overburden them financially with fees that may be designed for a larger operation,” one board member said during the meeting.

Under the proposal, an owner bringing in 200 gallons annually would pay $540 in permit and flowage fees, equivalent to $2.70 per gallon before the cost of fuel and any insurance expenses. City staff agreed to explore a tiered fee structure or exemptions for lower-volume users before returning the proposal to the board.

Federal Self-Fueling Rules

“We sell fuel at our airport exclusively, but the FAA says we have to allow for self fueling,” said Mike New, the city’s executive director of development and infrastructure, during the meeting. “It’s a requirement.”

The FAA’s February 2026 compliance manual protects aircraft owners’ self-fueling rights at federally obligated airports while allowing reasonable safety requirements. The agency also permits airports to assess the same fuel-flowage fees charged to commercial fuel providers. Whether the proposed Nacogdoches permit requirements meet those standards has not been established.

The advisory board has not endorsed a final fee structure, and city staff will return with revised options before the proposal advances to the City Council.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 1

  1. It’s amazing how many schemes airport operators come up with to charge fees! I would prefer to pay an FBO for mogas or unleaded avgas if it was available. Unless hangar or tie-down fees are really cheap, all this will do is drive owners to go somewhere else.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE