NBAA Pushes New Effort To Curb CFIT Accidents

NBAA is intensifying efforts to reduce CFIT accidents, citing pilot response to terrain warnings and situational awareness as key risk factors.

Shutterstock [EB Adventure Photography]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) is intensifying efforts to reduce Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents in business aviation, citing continued concerns about pilot response to warnings and situational awareness.
  • Despite widespread advanced avionics like TAWS in most business aircraft, CFIT remains a leading safety challenge, with 38 accidents and 114 fatalities from 2017-2025, indicating the issue lies primarily in human factors and how pilots interact with technology.
  • NBAA is addressing this by focusing on pilot human factors, conducting surveys to understand reactions to alerts, and emphasizing scenario-based training, strengthened standard operating procedures, and disciplined adherence to warning systems.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) is stepping up efforts to reduce controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents, pointing to continued concerns over pilot response to cockpit warnings and lapses in situational awareness.

CFIT—an unintentional collision with terrain, water or obstacles while the aircraft remains under control—remains a leading safety challenge. Though relatively rare, such accidents are often fatal.

While airline CFIT rates have declined sharply over the past two decades—largely due to widespread adoption of terrain awareness and warning systems (TAWS)—business aviation has not seen comparable gains. NBAA data shows that from 2017 to 2025, 38 CFIT accidents involving turbine aircraft resulted in 114 fatalities, with most occurring during the enroute and approach phases of flight.

NBAA Safety Committee members say the issue is not a lack of technology, but how pilots interact with it. “The primary limitation is crew response to warnings,” said CFIT project leader Richard Meikle, noting that most business aircraft are already equipped with advanced avionics, including TAWS, head-up displays and integrated autoflight systems.

The committee is now focusing on the human factors behind those responses. A new NBAA survey aims to better understand how pilots react to terrain alerts, with findings expected to shape future training guidance and potential refinements to warning systems.

NBAA is emphasizing scenario-based training, strengthened standard operating procedures and disciplined adherence to TAWS alerts. The association has also expanded its CFIT resource library with additional case studies and simulator-based training tools designed to replicate high-risk scenarios.

Amelia Walsh

Amelia Walsh is a private pilot who enjoys flying her family’s Columbia 350. She is based in Colorado and loves all things outdoors including skiing, hiking, and camping.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 2

  1. Yes, many instances including:

    • a pilot in South America shouting ‘Shutup Gringo’ at TWS warning, before he died against a mountain
    • Canadian International pilots who did respond but then tried the same approach again, after second warning checked their instrument switching etc. and realized they’d tuned a VOR not the ILS at Prince George BC. (Possible that a mix of fleet configurations after merger contributed - but trying approach again? !)

    Yet recently a number of undershoots in North America - hitting localizer antenna , late for TWS but perhaps EGPWS would help a bit.

  2. Brain fade - shameful, having known the main push behind the warming system: Don Bateman.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.