FAA, AOPA: Comments Wanted On Cessna 177 And 210 Spar Cracking

Image: ATSB
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A fatal 1976 Cessna T210M crash, caused by spar carrythrough structure separation, prompted Textron to issue a Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) for inspections on Cessna 210 and 177 models.
  • The MSB mandates inspections within 10 flight hours for aircraft with over 2,500 total hours and "severe" usage, while "typically" operated aircraft start inspections at 15,000 hours.
  • The FAA has issued an Airworthiness Concern Sheet, and AOPA is gathering member feedback on the affected fleet's status, modifications, and usage to help determine if the accident was an anomaly or a precursor to widespread corrosion-induced fatigue cracking.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Following the fatal crash of a 1976 Cessna T210M in Australia, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau determined the aircraft had suffered a separation of the spar carrythrough structure, which prompted Textron to issue a Mandatory Service Bulletin to inspect the area on both the 210 and Cessna Cardinal/177 models.

While we previously reported on this issue, Textron’s guidance makes clear that the mandatory inspections within the next 10 flight hours apply to aircraft with more than 2500 hours’ total time that have been subjected to “severe” usage. For aircraft operated “typically,” the inspections would start at 15,000 hours’ total time. The accident airplane had been modified with additional fuel capacity and fitted with a tail-boom sensor pack, and had more than 12,000 hours. 

While refraining from making the service bulletin into an Airworthiness Directive, the FAA nonetheless published an Airworthiness Concern Sheet on June 27 calling for feedback from owners and mechanics to help determine if the Australian accident was an anomaly or a possible precursor to corrosion-induced fatigue cracking of the carrythrough member on these cantilever-wing Cessnas. And now AOPA has joined in, asking members to submit their findings so that the association can help organize this data for the FAA. 

AOPA says that “The information requested is intended to help the FAA determine the status of the affected fleet, including total time-in-service on airframes, any modifications or supplemental type certificates, and the usage environment in which aircraft are operated.” The association wants to submit feedback to the FAA by Aug. 1, 2019.

mcook

KITPLANES Editor in Chief Marc Cook has been in aviation journalism for more than 30 years. He is a 4000-hour instrument-rated, multi-engine pilot with experience in nearly 150 types. He’s completed two kit aircraft, an Aero Designs Pulsar XP and a Glasair Sportsman 2+2, and currently flies a 2002 GlaStar.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Please support AVweb.

It looks like you’re using an ad blocker. Ads keep AVweb free and fund our reporting.
Please whitelist AVweb or continue with ads enabled.